
Technology Committee
Technology Sub Committee
Date: January 1, 2025
Time: 2 – 3 p.m.
Location: Via Zoom
Meeting ID: 9999 999 999999
Password: 123456789
Tri-Chairs
General Members
|
Agenda
| Time | Topic | Purpose | Discussion Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9:00-10:00 | Review Tech Committee Scope and Charge PPT | D | Vollaneuva |
Minutes
Key takeaways
- The Technology Committee is tasked with developing a technology plan for Foothill College by Spring 2026
- The committee will gather data through surveys and focus groups from students, faculty, classified staff, and administrators during Winter 2026
- The technology plan will be written from the perspectives of key constituents and will be action-plan focused
- The committee will align with the Blueprint for Success and follow the Somos Uno approach to sync with De Anza College and Central Services
- The committee is not focused on AI technology, as there is a separate AI fellows program for that purpose
- A district-wide Client Relations Management (CRM) tool called Element 451 will be going to the board in January
Discussed topics
Committee Membership and Structure
The committee discussed the current membership and structure of the Technology Committee.
Details
-
- Voltaire: Explained that the committee membership mirrors what De Anza College has, with subject matter experts and representatives from different senates
- Laurie: Mentioned that Cynthia Huang was added last minute and should be invited to future meetings
- Nannette: Will be visiting the Associated Students next quarter to recruit student representatives
- Voltaire: Listed the subject matter experts including Justin Schultz from ETS, Stephanie Crosby, Chris Yang, Lene, Nadine, Srichandana, and Liz from IR
Conclusion
- The committee has tri-chairs: Laurie Scolari, Voltaire Villanueva, and Nannette Regua
- The committee needs student representatives who will be recruited next quarter
- The current meeting was introductory, with more robust conversations planned once students join
Committee Charge for the Academic Year
The committee discussed their primary charge for the academic year.
Details
-
- Voltaire: Explained that the committee is charged with developing a technology plan that will feed into the Blueprint for Success
- Laurie: Emphasized the importance of addressing the technological equity gap that students face
- Nannette: Clarified that this is not an AI technology committee, as there is a separate committee
working on AI
Conclusion
- The committee will focus on developing a technology plan during the 2025-2026 academic year
- The plan will be implemented in Fall 2026 and last until approximately 2030
- The committee will not focus on AI technology as that is handled by a separate AI fellows program
Data Collection Process
The committee discussed how they will gather data to inform the technology plan.
Details
-
- Voltaire: Explained they will gather data through surveys and focus groups from all constituent groups
- Laurie: Emphasized the importance of understanding the different lenses through which faculty, classified staff, administrators, and students interact with technology
- Janie: Suggested looking at previous tech landscape analysis work done which identified duplicate software applications across departments across the college
- Voltaire: Agreed that looking at existing artifacts would be valuable to spark curiosities
and see where previous work left off
Conclusion
- Data collection will occur during Winter 2026 through surveys and focus groups
- The committee will consider the different perspectives of students, faculty, classified staff, and administrators
- Previous work and artifacts will be reviewed to inform the current planning process
Technology Landscape Analysis
The committee discussed a previous technology landscape analysis that could inform
their work.
Details
-
- Laurie: Explained that she had hired a consultant named Scott Klein to create this landscape analysis when she first joined Foothill
- Laurie: The analysis revealed that many different technology tools don't communicate with each other
- Laurie: The district subsequently hired the same consultant to do a similar analysis at
De Anza
Conclusion
- The landscape analysis revealed significant issues with disconnected technology systems across the college
- This analysis led to the district's decision to implement a new Client Relations Management (CRM) tool called Element 451
- The technology plan will need to consider this new CRM system
Structure of the Technology Plan
The committee discussed how the technology plan should be structured.
Details
-
- Voltaire: Explained that the plan should be written for efficiency with an action plan focus
- Laurie: Emphasized that the plan should be written from the perspectives of students, faculty, classified staff, and administrators
- Voltaire: Mentioned that De Anza's technology plan could be used as a guide, following the Somos Uno approach
- Laurie: Stressed the importance of making the plan innovative and interesting, not a traditional
plan
Conclusion
- The plan will be written from the perspectives of key constituents
- It will be action-plan focused and written for efficiency
- The committee aims to create an innovative approach to technology planning
Action items
-
Nannette
- Visit the Associated Students in January to recruit student representatives
- Have one of the designers send the Foothill background to Laurie and potentially the whole committee
-
Chris
- Share the technology landscape document with the committee
-
Committee
- Review De Anza's technology plan for guidance
- Prepare to gather data through surveys and focus groups in Winter 2026
- Consider inviting ETS to present on Element 451 at the next meeting
